YAGH/- Proenza Schouler
This collection nearly ended up on my
‘BLAGH’ list – the first looks were all very nice, very Proenza, but I was
sitting there half falling asleep. I believe reviewers refer to this as the designer
‘solidifying their signature’ or ‘re-establishing their house codes’ or
something. For me, however, it just felt a little bit like going over old
ground and not particularly well enough to make you want to sit through it.
Kind of like somebody unnecessarily introducing you to a friend of theirs that
you already know all about. Things got interesting in the final looks though
as Jack and Lazaro really opened their creativity up and gave us a taste of
where they can take this old rust-bucket that is fashion.
Dresses with large-scale singular photo
prints were covered with eyelets, grommets and flat studs. Cathy Horyn
articulated their inspiration thus:
“On the Internet they found images of
protesters, a beach scene, and they were planning to cut them up and combine
them in some way with woven leather and maybe studs. The finished garments, in
fact, were mesmerizing: couture as Tumblr.”
This ‘couture as tumblr’ idea really
grabbed my attention. If you extrapolate that statement out you can start to
see the connections between the two things. Tumblr and other photo sharing
sites are all about personal involvement and curation. It’s not just the
passive consumption of images and garments, but active involvement, just
like old school couture.
This feels incredibly contemporary. More
like the fashion industry may be taking teensy steps towards approaching
clothes as people do, as individual unique experiences. The studs were what
really pushed it for me. It’s what took it beyond merely being another digital
print. In fact it’s what made these dresses feel truly digital. Each little dot
felt like a tumblr note, each eyelet was a reblog. The cumulative effect was
almost a hint towards crowd-sourced fashion, as if you could feel each and
every viewer’s emotional involvement in the work.
Digital is all about the personal, and
these dresses felt very personal. At the end of the day it’s about active
involvement in the world around us, and this ‘tumblr couture’ feels like a
statement of that.
/NAGH – Rodarte
Rodarte was a double betrayal. Not only did
they fail to get back on track after a fair run of bad seasons (which I’ve been
desperate for them to do since like S/S11), but they copied other visionary
designers so badly and unimaginatively. Firstly, the appeal of Rodarte has
always been their pure artistic vision and uncompromising non-trendiness. It’s
about the Rodarte sisters’ personal story, and engagement with their work. This
season could’ve been designed by anyone. They completely abandoned their
aesthetic, and it felt rushed and uncared for. How sad. I honestly believe that
they could do their wispy draped distressed thing season after season (just in
different colourways, etc) and get away with it, because it’s simply undeniably
beautiful.
Unfortunately they seem to be feeling the
pressure to become some kind of ‘fashion’ brand – which is not just unnecessary
but totally wrong for them. Stick to the art/fashion, would be my advice. My main worry with Rodarte attempting
to ‘do’ fashion is that the sisters simply aren’t cut out for it. They’re clearly
quiet, bookish ladies (they studied art history and got into the fashion game
sort of by accident) and aren’t trained designers who have been initiated to
the pressures of the relentless fashion system. My suspicion is that they can’t
hack the seasonal nature of it all, and don’t have the kind of creativity that
can be relied upon, as most fashion designers do.
So why bother? Why do the fashion weeks at
all? Grow some balls ladies, and become the Alaia of America. It would be
amazing to have one fantastic Rodarte collection every couple of years.
(Just a reminder of how great they can be.)
My second gripe is the sheer badness of
the copying. A certain amount of copying is to be expected from the Americans,
after all that’s pretty much their thing. And I generally have no objection to
sellable designers copying the more avant-garde designers, because the whole
point of having an avant-garde is for their ideas to be made palatable by
others. That’s just how culture works. But seriously? The clothes were lumpy
misshapen literal translations of various Balenciaga designs from various
collections, grabbed harem scarem. The colours and fabric were taken wholesale,
and mashed up into scary Frankenstein’s monsters. This was less of a caring,
thoughtful homage; more of a panicked supermarket sweep. I even saw bits of
Dries van Noten’s beautiful fabric clashing in there and as far as I am
concerned Dries is the one designer you do not copy. Don’t even go there, I
won’t hear of it.
To be clear: If you are going to copy, copy
well. Copy with care, and heart, and bring something to it.
BLAGH – Alexander Wang
I usually like Alexander Wang, but this
season I have very little to say, apart from … meh. It was all very clean, and
polished, and refined, and whatever. The looks all blended into each other, and
I felt as if I was trapped in a prison of white and seethrough style lines,
desperately trying to count the days.
I’m pretty sure any old sod could have had
that idea and done what he did with it. Nice but, oh god, DULL. I’ve seen all
these ideas before. In fact, I think I may have had these ideas before myself and discarded them for being too ‘meh’ before beating myself for being so
generic and unimaginative.
Liked the knits though. Some lucky graduate
has gone and got themselves a nice job.




Found you via Style Bubble. Love your take on things, it's really refreshing.
ReplyDelete